Discussion about this post

User's avatar
David Shohl's avatar

Kevin, this seems like a suitable companion to “End of the Hunt,” as both plays offer a past that’s better than a future that pretends to be an improvement. In this sense, the two works also complement each other inasmuch as one features a historical setting while the other is set in a time to come.

“Succession Play”’s dialogue runs naturalistically and seamlessly, giving us information about the scenario (an idealistic/naive young king’s untimely ascent to the throne, abetted by a scheming advisor) and defining the characters and their motives.

I wondered about a couple of possible anachronisms like the expressions “red tape” and “without a stink” but I haven’t looked them up to see if they actually would have been used in a period that’s post-Marie Antoinette but pre-1900 (i.e., candles and torches). This is a very minor point but it did throw me off for a second, given that there are plenty of appropriately archaic terms like “zounds” and “forsooth” and “verily.”

I also wonder if the play might even be a bit too short since the Satanic consummation happens so suddenly, but with the right pacing and staging perhaps the shock will be delivered effectively. I probably need to imagine more screaming from the sizable cast than I did when just reading SCREAMS in print. Now that I think about it, it really shouldn’t be a problem, and the ending wouldn’t have to be anything protracted in order to achieve the nasty surprise moment that’s called for.

And speaking of timeliness, I can’t help but think of Mamdani…

5 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?